Overcoming the governance crisis

Parmi Natesan (Executive: Centre for Corporate Governance at the Institute of Directors in Southern Africa)

South Africa’s state-owned enterprises have a key role to play not only in delivering services to citizens, but also in funding the National Development Plan. However, it is clear that many major parastatals are still not in a position to fulfil this mandate.

I believe that solving this problem begins with the board. The challenges besetting our parastatals are complex, so it would be naïve to suggest that there is a silver bullet that can magically fix them. But, as many commentators have pointed out, one common shortcoming is the effectiveness of the boards. One of the findings of the IoDSA’s board appraisals benchmark study was that public sector boards lag behind private sector boards in their performance.

Given that boards play such an important strategic and governance role, I believe that the parastatals should seriously consider a professionalisation mandate including Chartered Director(SA)’s for the boards of state-owned entities.

Greater attention needs to be paid to the selection of board members at parastatals to ensure that they have the necessary professional and personal skills, as well as industry knowledge and experience. Public-sector boards suffer from the fact that board members (as well as members of the executive team) are often seen to be appointed or political reasons.

It’s vital that proper due diligence on potential directors is carried out. Being a director is a tough job, particularly in the public sector, and much depends on his or her performance. Care must be taken to find and appoint such people, or the board’s and ultimately the company’s—performance will be adversely affected.

The directorship role in both the public and private sectors is so important and so complex now that the IoDSA has launched a formal professional designation, the Chartered Director(SA), or CD(SA).

The IoDSA’s intent is to professionalise directorship. The CD(SA) initiative recognises that directors require specialist skills, experience and integrity alongside their purely business skills. Administered by the IoDSA, the CD(SA) designation gives directors a way to demonstrate their qualifications objectively, and to enhance them through a formal continuous professional development programme. Professional directors also subscribe to a code of professional ethics, and can be subject to the designation being revoked under certain circumstances.

A credible professional designation also helps selection committees identify candidates with the right skills, objectively assessed.

Government is aware of the potential for using the CD(SA) designation as a way of identifying the right calibre of directors. For example, the Public Protector, Thuli Madonsela, indicated that the Minister of Public Enterprises, Lynne Brown, would support the certification of directors as part of the appointment criteria for parastatal boards.

The CD(SA) designation is relatively new, so the pool of people entitled to use it is still small, but the Minister should certainly be encouraging parastatal board members to begin the process of certification. In the meantime, members of parastatal boards need to keep abreast of developments, attend governance training, and generally make sure they understand their role. Board members who are professional in their attitude, their skillsets and their commitment to a code of conduct will do better for the company.

Another benefit of improving the skills of directors would be the strong signal that government is serious about governance, and that it respects the role that boards have to play.

The board sets the tone for the whole company, oversees its strategy and ensures it is governed properly—a successful company needs a good board. If parastatals are going to be able to become contributors to the fiscus, they need to be properly governed, and ensuring that their directors are at the match makes sound business sense.

 Parmi Natesan (Executive: Centre for Corporate Governance at the Institute of Directors in Southern Africa)


comments powered by Disqus


This edition

Issue 68